Monday, July 23, 2018

Ancestry's "We're Related" App

We're Related app
My relationship to Stephen Amell
is confirmed
Edit to add Mar 28, 2019: Since publishing this article, it's come to my attention that the We're Related app is no longer available from app stores to download. It will still function if you still have it on your device, but you can no longer download it. I contacted Ancestry.com support about this, but they refused to give me any information on when and why the discontinuation happened and why there was no announcement, and instead flat out denied that they even owned the app (see below). Maybe they sold it at some point, but they most definitely owned it at one point, as proven by older community/Facebook topics answered by Ancestry reps as though they manage or own it found here in 2017 and here in 2016. So I've now asked them if they sold it, when and why did that happen and why was there no announcement. No response yet.

I know it's only a little app that produces a lot of false connections, but this lack of communication and transparency with their paying customers is just so typical of Ancestry.com.

Edit to add July 29, 2019: Ancestry.com have finally recently sent out an email about the discontinuation of the We're Related app, and added a help article detailing the same, available here. How odd that they would finally announce the discontinuation of an app they claimed they didn't even own back in March. While it's nice to finally see some acknowledgment of this, it just highlights the fact that their customer service reps either don't know what they're talking about or are just flat out lying.

Ancestry's denial that they ever owned the app which they've
now finally announced has been discontinued.


--------------- Original article:-----------------

As many of you may know already, Ancestry.com has an app available called "We're Related". It's a fun little app that looks at Ancestry's vast database of user created family trees and attempts to find common ancestors between you and famous people, both of today and in history. It probably goes without saying that you should be careful about accepting the authenticity of the connections the app makes, given that it's based on user created trees and we all know how error-filled they can be, but that doesn't mean it can't be accurate sometimes.

Out of curiosity, I set out to determine how many of the famous people it's claiming I'm related to are actually accurate. Admittedly, I haven't gotten very far because most of the common ancestors the app finds are colonial, meaning they can be difficult to research. That doesn't mean the app is wrong, just that a lot of them can't be confirmed or denied either way. But so far, I have been able to confirm one link, and deny another.

I started with the ones who had common ancestors I recognized because they were already in my own tree (the app will extend on your tree to find common ancestors even further back than you've researched). That way, I at least knew my own descent from that common ancestor was accurate, and only had to research the path from the common ancestor to the famous person in question.

So the first famous person I've been able to confirm my relation to is Stephen Amell (shown above). For those of you who don't watch the TV show "Arrow" based on the D.C. Comic's superhero Green Arrow, Stephen Amell is the star of the show (also, you're missing out). He's not exactly an A-lister but it's still pretty cool. Additionally, although the app doesn't mention it, Stephen Amell's cousin is Robbie Amell, who had a brief part in the corresponding TV show, The Flash, and it's their shared ancestry which I also share so I'm related to both of them. Our shared ancestors are Jacob C Gottschalk, who was the first Mennonite bishop in America (not to be confused with the first Mennonite minister in America, the more famous William Rittenhouse), and his wife Aeltien Symons Hermans. My path to Jacob is well documented, since he was a somewhat well known historical figure, at least among Mennonite history, his descendants are well documented, which made researching down to Stephen and Robbie Amell fairly easy as well. Jacob was my 7th great grandfather and Stephen's 9th great grandfather, making us 8th cousins twice removed.

App shows the path from alleged
common ancestor to the Cole
family
Sadly, not all the connection are this easy to confirm, nor are they always so accurate. I went after another suggested relation, Nat King Cole (shown right). The app seemed to think we shared ancestors Peter Schumacher and his wife Sarah Hendricks. Again, these ancestors were already in my tree so I knew they were accurate and only needed to research down Nat King Cole's side. On his path, the app suggested that Peter and Sarah's daughter was Fronica or Frances Schumacher, which indeed she was and I already had her in my tree. The next step showed Fronica's son Peter Van Bebber b. 1695, which was again correct according to the research already in my tree. But next it claimed that Peter's daughter was an Esther Van Bebber b. 1707 who I had no record of and anyone with any kind of observation skills will immediately notice that it's highly unlikely Peter had a child when he was only 12 years old. So I don't know who has this lineage in their tree that the app is picking up, but it's probably incorrect and it's a good thing I checked it before accepting it as fact. Looks like I'm probably not related to Nat King Cole after all. Bummer.

The good thing about the app is that it does use words like "Possible Common Ancestor" so hopefully people don't take it too seriously without researching and confirming connections. Additionally, at the bottom of each pathway (either from you to the ancestor, or the famous person to the ancestor), it asks "Does this path look correct to you?" and offers a thumbs up or thumbs down (shown below). Unfortunately, it doesn't offer any kind of comment box for you to detail what looks wrong about it if you thumbs-down it, but it's better than nothing.


Also noteworthy is the one I found in which the pathway from me to a common ancestor who is in my tree may have been wrong. When looking at the suggestion for my relation to Elizabeth Montgomery, we allegedly share known ancestors of mine, Robert Cobbs and Rebecca Vinckler - however, when I open up the pathway from myself to Robert, there is a very noticeable inconsistency with my own tree on Ancestry.com. In my tree (which the app is supposed to be working off of), Thomas Cobbs Jr is obviously the son of Thomas Cobbs Sr, who is the son of the Robert Cobbs in question, but in the app, it bizarrely has the mother of Thomas Cobbs Jr as Susanna Moon, who is then the daughter of Mildred Cobbs, the daughter of Robert.

Now, I supposed it's not impossible that the pathway in the app is correct and I just have yet to discover it, which would mean I am descended from Robert Cobbs in two ways. But that would also mean Susanna Moon married her uncle, and that sounds kind of gross and highly unlikely. I know it's not uncommon for 1st cousins to marry, but uncle and niece? It's not something I've ever come across (except in royalty/nobility, but that's different). Given the unlikeliness of this situation to begin with, and the fact that I have no record of Robert having a daughter named Mildred, I think this pathway is probably inaccurate. Even assuming for a moment it's correct, it's still strange that the app went with a pathway which is not in my tree instead of the one which is. So make sure you look at each pathway, even if the common ancestor is already one in your tree who you've confirmed. Don't just assume since the ancestor is correct, the pathway to you is as well. Regardless though, I am descended from Robert Cobbs, and so if Elizabeth Montgomery is as well, then we are indeed related, even though the pathway is wrong.

Although I have some criticisms of the app, it does give me a lot to do when I'm stuck on brick walls in my normal research. This gives me something different to explore, while still working on my family tree. Hopefully, as I carry on with it, I can continue to confirm or deny more and more relationships to famous people.

(Note: when you first set up the app, it will take a few days to look for and start generating people you're related to, and it will continue to update and add more and more people to the list over time.)

25 comments:

  1. What happened to the We’re Related app in the App Store ? My We’re Related disappeared and now it’s no longer in the App Store to reinstall it! 😞😳

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How strange! Mine is still on my phone but you're right, I'm not finding it in the app store anymore. Maybe they are retiring it? You'd have to contact Ancestry.com and ask: ancestrysupport@ancestry.com

      Delete
    2. I'm glad I'm not the only one who can't find the app. Thanks for the email address to support!

      Delete
    3. Yeah I didn't even know they did away with it. I think that is a loss for them nobody paid for it. I found family ties further back and resurched and it was proven true.

      Delete
    4. In Ancestry Support they told me that We’re Related had been retired. This is so disappointing. Why didn’t they warn me? There were over 100 relatives that had been found. That’s a lot of information to lose. I could have saved all that information with photos, etc. It was very accurate. Wish they would let me at least save what was there. ��

      Delete
    5. I agree, John. I had taken screenshots of a lot of my famous supposed relatives, but probably didnt get them all. And now I can't see HOW I was supposedly related to them.
      I think we deserve to at least have access to whatever information we had gotten up to the point that they discontinued it.

      Delete
  2. Nope, can’t find it either :(

    ReplyDelete
  3. We’re Related is no longer in the App Store. I had it, It disappeared, and now it’s no longer available in the App Store. Please look into this. Thanks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Anna, if you want to contact Ancestry about this, you can email them at: ancestrysupport@ancestry.com

      Delete
  4. If you do a Google search, you will find a link to download the We're Related app.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The only link I can find from a Google search is in Google Play, but clicking on it, it says "We're sorry, the requested URL was not found on this server."

      Other Google results include a support article on Ancestry.co.uk but clicking on it says "The page or file you were looking for could not be found." Searching Ancestry.com Support articles for We're Related does not bring back any results on the app. It's as though the app just disappeared and Ancestry haven't bothered to make a statement on it or announce it.

      Delete
  5. I've had the app for some time and was going to tell a friend about it, so thought it best to research the details of the app. This when I saw that it is no longer available. Found your article (very well written) and thought it was funny that one of the first finds for me was Stephen Amell. 8th cousin, via common ancestor Wendell Bauman. It's cool, but each of us has about a half a million 8th cousins.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Unfortunately, my Samsung Galaxy S7 edge quit working this week. I was able to see the We're Related app on Monday on my old phone. Since getting my new phone on Tuesday I haven't been able to get it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I uninstalled it to reinstall it, and it was gone! Kind of really makes me madd. I'm guessing since it wasn't producing money, it was eliminated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thats what i did deleted to reinstall to fix issues i thought it would...now its gone

      Delete
  8. You can download it here: https://apkpure.com/we-re-related/com.ancestry.notables

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is for Android only, and I can't verify it's reliability, so download at your own risk.

      Delete
  9. I got a new phone and lost this app. Very disappointed as it was great fun

    ReplyDelete
  10. As of today I have 769 possible relatives on We're Related. I would like to see a search engine as part of the app. So I can easily look up someone. The app is broken down by profession but I have 237 Actors and Actresses. So I have to go through each one to find the person I am looking for.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's unlikely we'll see any updates for this app since it appears to have been discontinued from app stores. Next time you update your phone, you'll likely lose access to it.

      Delete
  11. My app stopped working as well I do have it on my tablet as well but it is giving trouble can't connect to server so I called ancestry and asked them why the said the app is not available in the app store any more, I do know some of my friends and cousins that still have it and it is working for them but I did talk to ancestry and they said if we want to try and get the app back that people need to call them and put the request back in to them and they will contact the person that connected with them on the app to see if they can bring it back, just to let you all know on the information I was told

    ReplyDelete
  12. They have discontinued the app. As well as any access to the information on it for the people that may have it installed on their devices Still. My guess is they’re going to come back with something similar but you will have to pay for it, a subscription fee probably expensive as well.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I checked this app daily, I loved it and I want my information back.
    How can I subscribe?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As it says in the article, the app has been discontinued, there is no way to get the information from it back: https://support.ancestry.com/s/article/Discontinuing-the-We-re-Related-App?

      Delete
  14. I did a similar thing and created a worksheet where I copied all the connections so I could work on confirming or denying each one. Unfortunately, most of them I've either disproved or can't confirm or deny it so it remains a mystery. It was fun for a while, but I am more focused on DNA matches now.

    ReplyDelete