Above: A photo of my once-slave owning relatives alongside their black servants who were probably once slaves if they were old enough - this photo is from the 1890s. I also have ancestors who were slave holders but no photos of them alongside former slaves. Is it okay to feel ashamed of this photo and the relatives in it?
I'm not going to beat around the bush, I'm just going to say it: don't let people tell you your feelings are wrong if you feel ashamed of something an ancestor did that was really heinous.
I know what people will argue. "But it's not your fault! You had nothing to do with it! You're not responsible for your ancestors actions!"
And yeah, that's all true. But feeling ashamed of what someone else did doesn't mean you're responsible for it or had anything to do with it. Those things are not mutually inclusive. Feeling ashamed of an ancestor doesn't mean feeling ashamed of yourself.
Because let's flip things for a moment. Have you never once felt pride in something great, something positive that an ancestor did or accomplished? I'm pretty sure we all have - it's a large part of genealogy. We all feel some kind of ties or connections to our family history and our ancestors, because why else would we do this? Genealogy sort of loses all meaning if we don't feel some kind of connection to our ancestors. And if it's okay to feel pride in our ancestors through these ties we feel to them, why would we not also be allowed to feel ashamed of them when appropriate? Isn't it a little bit hypocritical to feel pride in our ancestors when they do something wonderful, but shrug it off with "nothing to do with me" when they do something terrible? Isn't it just a little too convenient to have the luxury to only claim a connection to the good stuff? And again, to be clear, that connection doesn't make you responsible.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to shame people. I'm not saying anyone should feel ashamed - certainly not of themselves. I just think people who do feel ashamed of an ancestor or relative shouldn't be insulted, mocked, told they are wrong, or given a hard time for it in any way, and yet this something I see a lot whenever the topic comes up. On the contrary, I think people who are able to explore those feelings, and understand they can feel ashamed of an ancestor without being personally responsible for their actions, are very emotionally mature and intelligent. It seems to me that people who can't accept that dual reality are uncomfortable with something their ancestors did and instead of processing that emotion, they just shut it down. The fact that other people are able to process it makes them doubly uncomfortable, and so they lash out. And if what I have to say about that makes some people angry, that kind of just proves my point.
Just let people feel whatever they feel. It doesn't mean they're consumed with guilt, it doesn't mean they can't still enjoy genealogy. Ultimately, it's not anyone's place to tell anyone else how they should or shouldn't feel.
So yes, it is okay to feel ashamed of something an ancestor did, just like it's okay to feel proud of something an ancestor did. It can even be the same ancestor you can feel both ashamed and proud of at the same time. Human beings have the emotional complexity for both those feelings to exist at the same time. That doesn't mean you should or have to feel ashamed of an ancestor, but it does mean when you come across someone who does, just respect their feelings because they're not wrong to feel that way.
Pathetic snowflake!
ReplyDeleteAnd there you go, point proven... hit a nerve, did I? You are clearly not emotionally mature or intelligent enough to comprehend the emotional complexity or process your feelings about topics like this, so you're lashing out by name calling, like a child would. If being a "snowflake" means being more emotionally intelligent than you are, then I'm proud to be one.
DeleteI have to say that I do not feel particular personal shame myself for the shameful things my ancestors might have done, anymore than I feel personal pride in the good deeds or fame they might have enjoyed.
ReplyDeleteMy ancestors were their own persons and their deeds -- good or bad -- were their own. They did not choose me to be a descendant, nor did I choose them to be my ancestor.
I do think it is important to acknowledge shameful deeds as shameful and not try to explain them away or make excuses. And it is pleasant to think upon the good deeds, as well.
I appear to descend from a number of people who were poor, some who could not read. Am I ashamed of them? No. If I were a descendant of, say a signer of the Declaration of Independence, should I feel personal pride? I say no. What do I have to feel proud about? How does an ancestors personal qualities reflect upon me? It seems so foolish to me.
That's fair, but I do have to ask, what is the point of genealogy if you don't feel any kind of connection to your ancestors? If it's nothing to do with you, good or bad, it makes me wonder, why bother doing all this research? My husband feels the same way you do - but that's also precisely the reason he has no interest in genealogy, lol.
Delete